langdon winner造句

• Langdon Winner was born in San Luis Obispo, California on August 7, 1944.
• This work includes contributions on Albert Borgmann, Hubert Dreyfus, Andrew Feenberg, Donna Haraway, Don Ihde and Langdon Winner.
• Langdon Winner critiques the idea that technological evolution is essentially beyond the control of individuals or society in his book Autonomous Technology.
• Politics professor Langdon Winner theorises that social ideals are being read back to us as if they were lessons derived from science itself.
• This approach has also been criticized by scholars such as Langdon Winner for being excessively formulaic in its methods and too narrow in its focus.
• Jacques Ellul, Ivan Illich, Langdon Winner, Joseph Weizenbaum, Neo-Luddites and hold that technological progress has had a negative impact on humanity.
• There is a " lot " written on this the most widely-read is Langdon Winner's essay, Do Artifacts Have Politics?
• Gone is the quartet of columnists who for many years helped give Technology Review its distinctive critical tone : Langdon Winner, Bennett Harrison, Samuel Florman, Robert White.
• Van Vliet used the ensuing publicity, particularly with a 1970 " Rolling Stone " interview with Langdon Winner, to promulgate a number of myths that were subsequently quoted as fact.
• Van Vliet used the ensuing publicity, particularly with a 1970 " Rolling Stone " interview with Langdon Winner, to promulgate a number of myths which were subsequently quoted as fact.
• Moreover, amongst the consultants to the director are listed such names as Jeffrey Lew, T . A . Price, Belle Carpenter, Cybelle Carpenter, Langdon Winner, and Barbara Pecarich.
• In its strongest form, verging on social determinism, " What matters is not the technology itself, but the social or economic system in which it is embedded " ( Langdon Winner ).
• In his influential but contested ( see Woolgar and Cooper, 1999 ) article " Do Artifacts Have Politics ? ", Langdon Winner illustrates not a form of determinism but the various sources of the politics of technologies.
• "' Langdon Winner "'( born August 7, 1944 ) is Thomas Phelan Chair of Humanities and Social Sciences in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York.
• He countered an argumentation by Langdon Winner concerning the politics of artifacts illustrated by Robert Moses'bridges of Long Island Parkway . https : / / www . researchgate . net / publication / 259979181 _ Scams _ cannot _ be _ busted
• "In study after study, " said Langdon Winner of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in New York, " what is found is that some students do a little better, some students do a little worse, and for the rest there is no significant difference ."
• Faculty and lecturers included leaders and innovators in academia, politics, science, business, and the arts such as Harlan Cleveland, Mary Douglas, Langdon Winner, Stewart Brand, Howard Nemerov, Robert Reich, Walter Orr Roberts, Rusty Schweickart, Nicholas Johnson, and Paul Levinson.
• In NetFuture, an online newsletter about technology and social responsibility, Langdon Winner, a political science professor at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, described most pervasive-computing devices as " sheer silliness " and criticized researchers for spending more time trying to make appliances talk than attempting to mend society's problems.
• Langdon Winner ( Thomas Phelan Chair of Humanities and Social Sciences in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute of Troy, NY ) states that groups and social interests likely to be affected by a particular kind of technological change ought to be represented at an early stage in defining exactly what that technology will be.
• Langdon Winner makes a similar point by arguing that the underdevelopment of the philosophy of technology leaves us with an overly simplistic reduction in our discourse to the supposedly dichotomous notions of the " making " versus the " uses " of new technologies, and that a narrow focus on " use " leads us to believe that all technologies are neutral in moral standing.